[ KEY DOCUMENTS ]
PNAC: NEW PEARL HARBOR
OPERATION NORTHWOODS
UDAY/PUTIN/VREELAND
OBL WAS TIM OSMAN
BOJINKA - CENSORED
W 199 EYE
VREELAND NOTES
BIN LADEN & W BUSH<1<2
GOV SHAM 911COMMISSION
USA PATRIOT ACT
6 AUG 01 PDB(scrubbed)
CONGRESS 911 REPORT

Monday, July 16, 2007

Via RINF.com July 16th, 2007:

"A British scientist and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, John A. Blacker MSc IMI (Physical Systems), is planning to sue the BBC for mass public deception via their "9/11: The Conspiracy Files" program, RINF Alternative News can reveal.

The program which aired on 18 February, 2007, promised to offer a thorough examination of the events of 9/11 and answer many of the questions posed by the 9/11 Truth Movement.

However, the hour long program failed to investigate the tough questions and ignored hard evidence that points towards a deeper conspiracy, while presenting an unfair and unbalanced view of 9/11 research.

Scientist and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, John A. Blacker, is taking action against this portrayal on the grounds of 'Total Public Deception'.

In ongoing correspondence with the BBC, Mr. Blacker is requesting an official apology and a second program to be produced in order to 'set the record straight'.

Mr Blacker is preparing to take legal action against the BBC and is currently gathering evidence.

Earlier this month, ex MI5 whistleblower, David Shayler, along with Adrian Connock, producer of Mind the Gap which exposed the false flag terrorism in London on 7/7/05, released an extensive video rebuttal destroying the BBC’s attempt to discredit scientific evidence and eyewitness reports.

Speaking to RINF, Mr. Blacker said: "The BBC is being sued for lying to viewers and a formal apology and a new film correcting the scandalous misinformation is needed.

"How can 80+ strongest, undamaged and heaviest bottom floors offer only 0.78 seconds of resistance between them - yet were designed and built to withstand 3 times working load and have "indestructible cores" when new. This is without considering air resistance and any other slowing effect.

"This simple maths proves 911 was a demolition," he said.

In Mr. Blacker’s most recent letter to the BBC he provides scientific evidence to support his theory of a controlled demolition.

-----




• The full text of Blacker's letter ias avilable via the link to RINF.com above.

  Labels: disinformation, mockingbird

Tuesday, June 26, 2007

Actor/lecturer Gary Welz, last seen in February on WPIX-TV claiming he saw an airplane strike the World Trade Center, has now retracted his story following questions about his veracity raised by independent 9/11 researchers:



Note that Welz, a founding member of disinformation cell STJ911, also denies appearing in disguise as a "witness" on MSNBC on 9/11.

Labels: disinformation, mockingbird, stj911, UA175, WTC

Monday, April 16, 2007

Recent research reveals the WTC "controlled demolition" debate has been a constructed Hegelian dialectic since no later than 9/12 2001. For it was on that day that one Van Romero, of New Mexico Tech, announced in the local Albuquerque Journal that the Twin Towers were obviously taken out by a conventional controlled demolition. Romero quickly and quietly retracted his claim and disappeared from the scene. What was not revealed until now however, is that Romero is a major player in directed-energy weaponry, and a long time member of the Directed-Energy Professional Society (See 911researchers.com).

By planting the "controlled demolition" meme, Romero took eyes away from exotic and specifically directed-energy weapons' role in the destruction of the World Trade Center Complex.

How serendipitious, then, that Romero should also resurface this very weekend on the Discovery Channel of all places. Romero received special thanks for, and his Department presided over, something called "Conspiracy Test" -- an examination of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.

As OKBOMB is increasingly understood as 9/11 writ small, cursory reexamination yields the telltale signs of directed-energy weapons there too -- the powderized concrete, cylindrical cut-out patterned damage, and even scorch marks left on the roof by the earlier prototype of the weapon. Romero's constructed dialectic eschewed such anomalies however, restricting the acceptable frame of debate to truck-bomb vs column-bomb.

So it should be little surprise then that even as Romero's documentary premiered on Discovery, Discovery cameras were in Austin, Texas to tape a purportedly scientific presentation hewing to a similarly circumscribed 9/11 debate. For, as a result of an elaborate and targeted psychological operation aimed at leaders of the "patriot" community in the Austin area, the leading "scientific" figure speaking at the University of Texas conference came from the same 33^o exo-weaponry milieu as Romero.

Thus, any presentation by Discovery will be similarly restricted, between the ridiculous official theory(/ies) and the equally ludicrous "superthermate" theory. Such false opposition keeps activists' heads spinning on an untraceable thermite goose chase rather than agitating for grand-jury investigations of institutions such as Raytheon, Applied Research Associates, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and others whose weaponry can be tied to the utter devastation of World Trade Center.

A possible silver lining over Texas: secrecy-gagged panelist Col. Dr. Bob Bowman valiantly tried to warn on the Austin-based nationally-syndicated Deadline Live radio program Friday that "Star Wars" is offensive weaponry designed to take out targets such as buildings from space-based platforms, sewing confusion in doing so.

Labels: directed-energy, disinformation, mockingbird, stj911

Thursday, February 22, 2007

From PrisonPlanet.com February 21, 2007:

"The BBC's response to complaints made against the bias and inaccuracy of the 9/11 Conspiracy Files documentary suggests that an overwhelming backlash has caused considerable consternation at the network and possible retractions or apologies may be forthcoming, with BBC bosses potentially fearing the company's credibility has been tarnished.

Following the airing of the show on Sunday evening, numerous websites representative of the 9/11 truth movement issued precise and detailed rebuttals to what many saw as nothing more than an outright hit piece that used crass emotional manipulation, concocted evidence and cynical bias in an attempt to dismiss questions about the official story behind 9/11.

Appearing on the Alex Jones show on Monday, the show's producer Guy Smith offered little to defend against allegations that the program represented nothing more than yellow journalism and an attempt to create a strawman argument in the interests of debunking 9/11 skeptics.

From what can be gleaned from how the BBC is treating complaints made against the show, it seems that the backlash has forced the complaints to be passed up the chain of command and that the overwhelming response is forcing bosses to consider whether it might be necessary to issue retractions or clarifications in an attempt to calm the furore.

Here's the BBC's standard response to complaints being made about the Conspiracy Files program.

Thank you for contacting the BBC.

This is to let you know that we are dealing with your recent complaint but are waiting to clarify some points with other colleagues in the BBC before we reply more fully to you.

We will of course respond as soon as possible but trust you will understand that the time taken can also depend on the nature and number of the other complaints we are currently investigating. The BBC also issues public responses to issues which prompt large numbers of significant complaints and these can be read on our website at www.bbc.co.uk/complaints

We would be grateful if you would not reply to this email...

-----

Labels: disinformation