Silvio Berlusconi, former Italian Prime Minister linked to the P2 Masonic Lodge terror cell and other false-flag operations, is apparetly now using his media empire to attack researchers into 9/11. From Il Giornale 15 novembre 2007:
" Secondo Marx la storia si ripete sempre due volte, la prima come tragedia e la seconda come farsa. Il movimento complottista nato per sostenere che l’11 settembre è stato un auto-attentato orchestrato dall’amministrazione Bush, per passare alla farsa ci ha messo pochi anni. L’esponente più rappresentativo di questa seconda fase è l’americano Webster Griffin Tarpley, che questa settimana gira l’Italia per propagandare il suo libro La fabbrica del terrore (Arianna Editrice - Macro Edizioni), già record di vendite negli Stati Uniti: per il gran finale a Roma il sito della casa editrice annuncia anche la presenza dell’immancabile europarlamentare Giulietto Chiesa.
Tarpley - il cui libro è un centone di assurdità tecniche sugli attentati di New York e Washington, già cento volte confutate ma che continuano a circolare - è screditato all’interno dello stesso movimento negazionista dell’11 settembre per alcune tesi e iniziative davvero bizzarre. Quest’estate ha lanciato il cosiddetto «Allarme di Kennebunkport», annunciando a breve un altro attentato in stile 11 settembre organizzato dal governo americano e distribuendo un manifesto firmato da alcuni dei più noti critici della guerra in Irak: quattro dei quali, però, hanno negato di avervi mai apposto la loro firma.
La quarta di copertina del suo libro negli Stati Uniti riporta i giudizi favorevoli di personaggi considerati «lunatici» anche da molti negazionisti come Nico Haupt, secondo il quale nessun aereo ha colpito le Torri Gemelle ma si è trattato di un astuto videomontaggio, e Gerhard Wisnewski, autore di due libri dove sostiene che anche lo sbarco sulla Luna è stato soltanto un trucco video («lunatici», appunto).
These activists, affiliated with We Are Change L.A. were apparently responding to Commissar Maher's recent call for 9/11 dissenters to be forcibly drugged.
Time-Warner television host Bill Maher, who has previously made a point of calling pharmaceutical drugs "poison," on Friday endorsed the drugging of Americans who don't endorse the treasonous 9/11 myth propagated by his corporate masters. Maher retreats to the "television is reality" meme, which is breaking apart under the relentless assault of independent 9/11 TVfakery researchers who must contend both with mainstream shills such as Maher as well as perps and dupes inside the "9/11 movement" itself.
An abbreviated edition of Total Info Radio webcast August 20, with a focus on an instant analysis of the History Channel special "9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction?"
Author Webster Tarpley, who appeared in the "9/11 Conspiracies" special last night on the Hearst-Story Channel offers this reply:
" 9/11 Conspiracies: When a Knock is a Boost.
Webster G. Tarpley 21 August 2007
Tonight's History Channel program on 9/11 Conspiracies - Fact or Fiction shows how powerful our movement has become, and how contemptible our opposition is. The deck was stacked, the animations were distorted and fantastic, and the framework was rather nasty, but this was of course NBC News, read GE, which is now a hedge fund in drag. And even NBC News, often the slimiest of the networks, has been forced to pretend to refute numerous factual criticisms of the official story, one by one. I say pretend because most of the refutations were simply blanket denials, with no facts or reasoning beyond mere assertions that the 9/11 truth theses are not true, offend the families, are disgusting, or "corrosive," and other meaningless verbiage. Some of the attempts at substantive refutation involved dodges and subterfuges that seemed new, at least to me. It sounded like one of their pseudo-experts was arguing that the wings of the alleged airplane at the Pentagon had broken off through hitting objects on the Pentagon lawn. If that was so, where are the wings and the jet engines on that pristine Pentalawn? This pitiful construct is self-contradictory and destroys itself. We also heard that building 7 was hollow at the base, quite an achievement under the New York City building code. The bottom of building 7 was, we now discover, an amphitheater, with no support columns, but only trusses! I guess if your argument is ruptured, then you need a truss. Another pseudo-expert thought that a commercial aircraft could transform itself into an artillery shell or tank round and punch through the Pentagon rings that way, despite the obvious difficulty. CIA man Michael Scheuer says all the evidence points to al Qaeda, but where is all that evidence, Mike? There was none in this program, to be sure. Otherwise, Mike was reduced to some pitiful whining that there are too decent patriotic people in the CIA - a moot point.
Some of the little people had obviously been leaned on to get them to change their testimony. But that was done with a nominalist stupidity worthy of William of Okham, the dumbest philosopher of the late Middle Ages. The wretched New York TV reporter had to say that he had reported secondary explosions, but not bombs. What precisely is the difference, when heard from afar? The poor Shanksville coroner had said that after a few minutes at the crash site, he had stopped being a coroner because there were no bodies. Now he says that he meant that he became an undertaker. Again, what is the distinction he is driving at? Where there bodies yes or no?
Most of the refutations were weak, fishy, lame, and unconvincing. In particular, any time they have to bring on Chip Berlet, that well-known gutter-dwelling character assassin and mercenary of the foundations, you know they are in big trouble, and he was quite prominent. I believe strongly in the victory of reality over fabrication and lies, and I suspect that this was the response of many viewers tonight. If we had a focus group, we could be sure, but I think more 9/11 came into the world than there were doubters who fell back into the official version based on this program.
But look at all the important factual material they had to present. The viewers got to see the squibs coming out of the twin towers. They got to see building 7 coming down, with ample comparisons to controlled demolition cases. They got to hear and see the infamous Silverstein. They got to see the singed hole in the internal rings of the Pentagon. They got to see the Shanksville crater. They got to hear about false flag operations from a chorus of authoritative voices, and for that there was no refutation. They also got a good source list for further research: Loose Change was prominent, as were Alex Jones and 9/11 Mysteries. Thierry Meyssan, the founder of our worldwide movement, got more recognition tonight than he has ever received in this country, and it is about time - his book the Big Lie is and remains a classic. They go to know David Ray Griffin, Bob Bowman, Jim Fetzer and many more. There was even a plug for my own 9/11 Synthetic Terror. Any serious, intelligent person - and there still are some - knows exactly where to go to find out more, and that can only be a big plus.
I have seen real raving slanders from NBC News, and they look different. Slanders are a relentless barrage of terms like Nazi, communist, SS, anti-semite, racist, white supremacist, Ku Klux Klan, and so forth, with no substance at all. There were only a few intervals when things began to get ugly in that way, and I do not think they convinced anybody.
Most revealing of the moral bankruptcy, intellectual cowardice, and overall weakness of the NBC spin machine were the themes they left out completely. Most glaring was that, even though he was allowed a couple of brief comments, literally all of Professor Steven Jones' work on thermite-thermate as the key to the controlled demolition of the twin towers was completely ignored. They seem to have concluded that refuting this would be a hopeless task.
They also avoided the most critical pieces of political evidence. There was not a word about the crucial "Angel is next" message accompanied by an array of top-secret code words received by the Secret Service, which is the one documented instance during the day when the invisible government-rogue network, the authors of the coup, actually came out of the shadows and spoke. Then, there was not one mention of the twenty-five plus (25 plus !!!) drills, exercises, and maneuvers which were either in progress on 9/11, had recently been concluded, or were in advanced stages of planning. Viewers who know 9/11 only through this program would not know that there was a single drill going on, even though the Kean-Hamilton commission did talk about Amalgam Virgo, at least during the hearings, and Vanity Fair last summer did acknowledge that some air drills were going on. There was discussion about the pros and cons of cell phone calls, but not a mention of the August 2001 drill at the Department of Transportation that had a scenario of a hijacked aircraft with cell phone calls coming in. Similarly, the program was much concerned with the intrinsically weak thesis of a stand-down, without once delving into the dozen or so Air Force drills that were ongoing and that really do explain the lack of air defense - along with the activities of a certain Colonel Marr. In my dealings with the NBC producer and his team, I went out of my way to stress these two points - "Angel is next" and the 25+ drills. At the Austin conference where much of this material was taped, I made an entire speech on "Angel is next," Bush's movements on 9/11, and the drills. But not a word got through. Several speakers, myself included, also pounded them as much as possible about the question of the NEW 9/11 and the looming war with Iran. At rally at the University of Texas tower, we already had the report about Cheney saying on Face the Nation that morning that his main fear was not of terrorist armed not with airline tickets and box cutters, but of a nuclear bomb in a US city. But the NBC people were not interested in that one, either.
The NBC program also tended to allege that the 9/11 truth movement sees Bush and Cheney as the prime movers and directors of 9/11 - an absurd thesis. Bush is a moron, and Cheney is a moribund old drunk with four heart attacks, quadruple bypass surgery, and a pacemaker that has to be serviced every couple of years. I tried to make the NBC people understand the idea of an invisible government much older than Bush and Cheney, going back in the present form at least to 1895, when J.P. Morgan forced President Grover Cleveland to knuckle and under and give Morgan and London total control over the US public debt. NBC was not having any of that, either.
I would urge people in the movement to ponder why specifically these themes were so totally excluded from a broadcast which was otherwise reasonably wide-ranging. I would argue that our oligarchical enemies in the invisible government are very much afraid of issues like the Jones thermite-thermate thesis, "Angel is next," Bush's movements on 9/11, the 25+ drills of 9/11, and the new 9/11. They do not much like to hear the invisible government itself talked about, either. Based on this, I would appeal to the 9/11 truth movement as a whole to redouble its attacks on precisely these themes to maximize the damage to the myth-mongers. Hammer them home mercilessly, for their power is enormous. We need to focus on the best scientific-technical evidence, and the best political evidence, as represented by these issues.
Part of the genius of the 9/11 truth movement is our ability to make even the financier-controlled media spread our ideas and work for us. Despite the worst intentions of NBC News, I would say that this is what they have accomplished. They have kept 9/11 truth research in the public eye. There is an old Broadway saying - "A knock is a boost." In other words, if we are so obscure and so crazy, why do we merit any attention at all? Or, as the Roman put it - "Bona fama, mala fama, semper fama" - good fame, bad fame, it's all fame, and we'll take it - the wisdom of the ancients.
Two-hour documentaries are not cheap and need to get some ratings. Clearly we are not so obscure as NBC News would have us believe. In fact, if we can hold off the new 9/11 for a few more months, 2007 may turn out to be our finest hour. -----
The History Channel is jointly owed by Hearst, General Electric, and Disney. Tonight, they'll attempt to prop up the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 by attacking skeptics. Listing from its History.com:
"9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction? Monday, August 20 09:00 PM Tuesday, August 21 01:00 AM Saturday, August 25 08:00 PM Sunday, August 26 12:00 AM
Examines the various conspiracy theories espoused on the Internet, in articles and in public forums that attempt to explain the 9/11 attacks. It includes theories that the World Trade Center was brought down by a controlled demolition; that a missile, not a commercial airliner, hit the Pentagon; and that members of the U.S. government orchestrated the attacks in hopes of creating a war in the Middle East. Each conspiracy argument is countered by a variety of experts in the fields of engineering, intelligence and the military. The program also delves into the anatomy of such conspiracies and how they grow on the Internet.
Your story on the recent Scholars for 9/11 Truth conference, "9/11 Doubters Doubt Each Other Too," was so distorted and pejorative that if I were a paranoid conspiracy theorist, I would suspect Popper of working for Project Mockingbird. (Google the term to see what I mean.)
Out of almost 20 hours of presentations, the reporter focused on the 10 seconds during which one presenter, Dave Von Kleist, expressed his fear of government infiltration of the 9/11 truth movement. And out of the many dozens of hours of informal conversation, Popper chose to highlight one in which similar fears were expressed.
I participated in many conversations throughout the weekend and can testify that all were convivial and concerned the science and politics of 9/11, not fears of government infiltration. For more on the conference, people can go to www.mujca.com/madisonconference.htm .
The reporter's aim in offering such a wildly distorted view of the conference can only have been to libel 9/11 truth seekers as paranoid -- a task that Isthmus already accomplished last summer, to its eternal shame and perhaps its eventual prosecution.
This libel, like the 9/11 blood libel against Muslims, dehumanizes its victims and makes its author, editor and publisher complicit in the holocaust of the 9/11 wars -- a holocaust that has already killed more than 650,000 people in Iraq alone and destroyed the lives of more than 6 million people in Iraq and Afghanistan by making them refugees.
As the example of Nuremberg suggests, journalists who act as propagandists for war crimes may one day find themselves on the scaffold. You would be well advised to strive for more balanced and accurate coverage in the future.
"A British scientist and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, John A. Blacker MSc IMI (Physical Systems), is planning to sue the BBC for mass public deception via their "9/11: The Conspiracy Files" program, RINF Alternative News can reveal.
The program which aired on 18 February, 2007, promised to offer a thorough examination of the events of 9/11 and answer many of the questions posed by the 9/11 Truth Movement.
However, the hour long program failed to investigate the tough questions and ignored hard evidence that points towards a deeper conspiracy, while presenting an unfair and unbalanced view of 9/11 research.
Scientist and member of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, John A. Blacker, is taking action against this portrayal on the grounds of 'Total Public Deception'.
In ongoing correspondence with the BBC, Mr. Blacker is requesting an official apology and a second program to be produced in order to 'set the record straight'.
Mr Blacker is preparing to take legal action against the BBC and is currently gathering evidence.
Earlier this month, ex MI5 whistleblower, David Shayler, along with Adrian Connock, producer of Mind the Gap which exposed the false flag terrorism in London on 7/7/05, released an extensive video rebuttal destroying the BBC’s attempt to discredit scientific evidence and eyewitness reports.
Speaking to RINF, Mr. Blacker said: "The BBC is being sued for lying to viewers and a formal apology and a new film correcting the scandalous misinformation is needed.
"How can 80+ strongest, undamaged and heaviest bottom floors offer only 0.78 seconds of resistance between them - yet were designed and built to withstand 3 times working load and have "indestructible cores" when new. This is without considering air resistance and any other slowing effect.
"This simple maths proves 911 was a demolition," he said.
In Mr. Blacker’s most recent letter to the BBC he provides scientific evidence to support his theory of a controlled demolition.
-----
The full text of Blacker's letter ias avilable via the link to RINF.com above.
Actor/lecturer Gary Welz, last seen in February on WPIX-TV claiming he saw an airplane strike the World Trade Center, has now retracted his story following questions about his veracity raised by independent 9/11 researchers:
Note that Welz, a founding member of disinformation cell STJ911, also denies appearing in disguise as a "witness" on MSNBC on 9/11.
ABC and Rosie O'Donnell announced Friday that she would not be returning to The View. The announcement followed a coordinated attack on O'Donnell on the Wednesday edition of the program by MOCKINGBIRD producer Bill Geddie and co-host Elizabeth Hasselbeck.
Careful viewers Wednesday saw Hasselbeck, who recently attended an anti-American ceremony at the White House expressing fealty to the British Crown, rolling her eyes to concentrate on her earpiece and Geddie's voice rather than cohost Behar's. When Hasselbeck started goading and screaming at O'Donnell, Geddie did not cut to commercial and went to an unprecedented splitscreen shot to degrade the dialogue further. Behar objected to Geddie's maneuver live on air, but Geddie kept at it until there was enough footage for the shitty cable shows to dissect and slander.
Leading entertainment gossip web sites had previously reported that O'Donnell wanted Geddie out as a condition of any contract renewal.
The move certainly means that no guest will be scheduled to discuss he concept of "9/11 truth" in a positive light.
A scheduled Thursday appearance on ABC's "The View" by two of the directors of Loose Change and 9/11 Keymaster Willie Rodriguez has been canceled.
The following information was posted to and disappeared from 911blogger.com:
"Submitted by Jon Gold on Tue, 05/22/2007 - 11:49am.
I have just been informed by Dylan Avery that the original date of May 24th for the Loose Change crew, and Willie Rodriguez to be on "The View" has been cancelled.
On June 4th, at the request of ABC, Jim Meigs is going to appear first, followed by Dr. David Ray Griffin.
The Loose Change crew will be in the audience, and will be allowed "speaking opportunities." I do not know if Willie Rodriguez will be in the audience accompanying them. -----
"What really happened on United Airlines Flight 93? [...] What really happened on American Airlines Flight 11? [...] Who murdered Katherine Smith, and why? [...] Why does Norm Mineta still have a job? Who's responsible for the anthrax attacks? ... So where the hell is Osama bin Laden, anyway? -----
It is uncertain at press time whether Malkin has called for herself to be thrown into a concentration camp for articulating such dangerous thoughts.
Recent research reveals the WTC "controlled demolition" debate has been a constructed Hegelian dialectic since no later than 9/12 2001. For it was on that day that one Van Romero, of New Mexico Tech, announced in the local Albuquerque Journal that the Twin Towers were obviously taken out by a conventional controlled demolition. Romero quickly and quietly retracted his claim and disappeared from the scene. What was not revealed until now however, is that Romero is a major player in directed-energy weaponry, and a long time member of the Directed-Energy Professional Society (See 911researchers.com).
By planting the "controlled demolition" meme, Romero took eyes away from exotic and specifically directed-energy weapons' role in the destruction of the World Trade Center Complex.
How serendipitious, then, that Romero should also resurface this very weekend on the Discovery Channel of all places. Romero received special thanks for, and his Department presided over, something called "Conspiracy Test" -- an examination of the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
As OKBOMB is increasingly understood as 9/11 writ small, cursory reexamination yields the telltale signs of directed-energy weapons there too -- the powderized concrete, cylindrical cut-out patterned damage, and even scorch marks left on the roof by the earlier prototype of the weapon. Romero's constructed dialectic eschewed such anomalies however, restricting the acceptable frame of debate to truck-bomb vs column-bomb.
So it should be little surprise then that even as Romero's documentary premiered on Discovery, Discovery cameras were in Austin, Texas to tape a purportedly scientific presentation hewing to a similarly circumscribed 9/11 debate. For, as a result of an elaborate and targeted psychological operation aimed at leaders of the "patriot" community in the Austin area, the leading "scientific" figure speaking at the University of Texas conference came from the same 33o exo-weaponry milieu as Romero.
Thus, any presentation by Discovery will be similarly restricted, between the ridiculous official theory(/ies) and the equally ludicrous "superthermate" theory. Such false opposition keeps activists' heads spinning on an untraceable thermite goose chase rather than agitating for grand-jury investigations of institutions such as Raytheon, Applied Research Associates, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and others whose weaponry can be tied to the utter devastation of World Trade Center.
A possible silver lining over Texas: secrecy-gagged panelist Col. Dr. Bob Bowman valiantly tried to warn on the Austin-based nationally-syndicated Deadline Live radio program Friday that "Star Wars" is offensive weaponry designed to take out targets such as buildings from space-based platforms, sewing confusion in doing so.
When 9/11 researchers last week discovered and disseminated a clip of BBC news reporters announcing that WTC building 7 had "collapsed" more than 20 minutes before it was destroyed in a controlled demolition on September 11, 2001. Leading corporate-connected, CIA- and NWO-controlled websites such as Google Video attempted to purge the video from the web, but ultimately gave up in the face of thousands fo grassroots infowarriors continuously uploading the video.
The image brought to mind other incidents over the past year of corporate media using copyright as a pretext to censor reality on behalf of their New World Order masters
One day after the 2006 midterm election, Bill Maher appeared on CNN's Larry King Live and announced that everyone in Washington knew that RNC Chairman Ken Mehlman was gay. CNN edited the comment from the late-night replay of the program, but not before gay activist John Aravosis of AmericaBlog.com had posted the exchange to YouTube.
However, Arianna Huffington's Huffington Post also hosted a clip of Maher and King and persevered in hosting the clip despite the blizzard of legal claims which saw it purged from everywhere else on the net. Is the law different for YouTube than it is for HuffingtonPost? No. But they have different lawyers. HuffingtonPost, which stresses the importance of fearlessness, did not take the bogus legal arguments of YouTube and CNN at face value -- and they turned out just fine.
Last May, the producers of the 9/11 documentary "Loose Change" received a cease-and-desist letter from lawyers representing the Naudet Brothers, some of whose film taken on 9/11 was used in "Loose Change." "Loose Change" producers Louder Than Words, Inc. have kept the Naudet film in online versions of their film but reportedly will back off of using this footage in an upcoming theatrical release.
Since that incident, the Naudet brothers have proved their motivation behind the legal threats to be little more than the suppression of information regarding 9/11. For after all, the most important Naudet footage used in "Loose Change", of New York firemen describing the explosions that went off in the twin towers, was in fact purged from the fifth anniversary edition of the film which aired on CBS September 11, 2006.
As "Loose Change" moves toward a theatrical edition and the BBC incident portends greater video battle ahead, the 9/11 truth movement should become increasingly fearless in asserting First Amendment free speech and fair use rights in intellectual property issues. At primary issue is evidence of a crime of mass murder -- evidence which should not be suppressed by those seeking to abuse copyright law. If an IP attorney with a history of siding with copyright totalists advises cowering before the likes of the Naudet brothers, he perhaps should be shunted aside for one more fearless -- one who would relish the opportunity to call the Naudets on their bluff and put them under oath about their possible foreknowledge of 9/11.
John Conner of the Resistance reports that talk show host Alan Colmes will no longer discuss the 9/11 inside job on his radio program. Alex Jones and others have discussed the matter in the past on the show. From Loose Change Forum Feb 3 2007:
"This shill.
He said the other day, on air, that I lie to get on the show, and when I am honest he'll let me on. So I told the screener who I was tonight. First and last name.
Alan got on the phone during the break and we had a little chat. He said he's done with me and Alex Jones and said what I say is "irrelevant."
"IRRELEVANT," HE SAYS! What a shill. He said he'd never have me as a guest, and I asked him, if I would call his show and make comments on relevant topics, if he would at least let me get on air as a caller. And he said that would be nice, and hung up on me instead of putting me back on hold.
So we have no agreement. There is no truce between us. He is a coward and a corporate whore. He won't cover the issues because he'll lose his job. The first half hour of his show he takes calls on any topic with no call screener, but when I call as "John from San Diego" he NEVER takes my call, and leaves me on hold for the ENTIRE show, takes DOZENS of calls and leaving me on the board instead of hanging up -- because he knows I'll just call back from a different city.
Stream his show live at this link. Save it in your favorites. Show is live from 7 to 10pm pacific. 9 to midnight central. 10 to 1pm eastern. phone number is 1 877- 367-2526 call it every day.
"Members of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, a non-partisan organization of students, experts and scholars dedicated to exposing falsehoods and revealing truths about 9/11, have some bones to pick with CBS NEWS for an article entitled, "Dangerous World Fuels Conspiracy Theorists" (30 January 2007). According to James H. Fetzer, the society's founder, "It is chock full of false assertions, even including misidentification of Steven Jones, my former co-chair, as the society 's founder."
"That is rather rich," Fetzer said. "Steve and I have had a parting of the ways over differences in our attitude and approach toward the science and the politics of 9/11 research. But if he had been 'the founder', he should have been conducting a 'house cleaning', not abandoning ship." The split between them, Fetzer added, has had a beneficial effect. "A cult-like atmosphere had developed around him, which I considered to be bad for scientific research on 9/11."
The CBS report focuses on Gary Welz, an adjunct lecturer at John Jay Criminal College and Lafayette University, who told a CBS reporter, Alfonso Serrano, that he had left Scholars in December following Jones "after other prominent members of Scholars began promoting wacky explanations for the fall of the twin towers." Fetzer replied, "That's wrong on several accounts, including that the Twin Towers did not 'fall' but disintegrated from massive sources of energy."
"Which theories are 'wacky' appears to depend upon how much you know about a subject," observed Judy Wood, a prominent member of Scholars. "When you consider the extent of the devastation of the World Trade Center, the very modest damage to its foundation, and as many as 1,400 'toasted' cars as much as a mile from ground zero, for example, any explanation that is based upon conventional explosives, including Steve Jones' own hypothesis, is going to look 'wacky' to those who know enough about the evidence in this case."
Although Jones has suggested that thermite and thermate could have brought down the Twin Towers, in a recent chapter in a new book edited by David Ray Griffin and Peter Dale Scott, 9/11 and American Empire (2007), Jones expresses astonishment that the top thirty floors of the South Tower started to fall but "turned mostly to powder in mid-air," an effect that his hypothesis cannot explain. "Indeed," Fetzer said, "other recognized scholars, such as Webster Griffin Tarpley, 9/11: Synthetic Terror (2005), have observed that an adequate explanation of the devastation to the WTC will almost certainly require the use of high-tech, directed energy weapons."
Among the claims CBS reported that are inaccurate or outdated, the statistics for skepticism from a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll have been superseded by a New York Times/CBS poll conducted last October, which showed that 53% of Americans doubt The 9/11 Report and 28% reject it completely, which means that 81% of the American people don't believe what the government has told them. "I don't quite understand how a CBN NEWS report could overlook the results of a poll in which CBS participated," Fetzer observed.
Wood pointed out that Jones' hypothesis is based on three primary sources of evidence: studies of dust samples, a waterfall-like flow of molten metal from the South Tower, and photographs that show workmen peering into a cavern glowing with molten metal. "I think Steve needs to think more about his own evidence," she said. "The dust samples were non-random and, if these photographs were authentic, the heat should have melted the skin from their faces." ...
Fetzer said, "another student of the case, Frank Greening, discovered a possible alternative explanation for the waterfall-like flow of molten metal, which Jones had insisted had to be molten iron caused by thermite or thermate. "Apparently, Fuji Bank had installed a massive assemblage of server-sized lead batteries around the 80th floor. Since lead melts at a much lower temperature than steel," Fetzer added, "that might explain this peculiar phenomenon, which was distinctive to this location."
[...]"The situation is even more awkward for the government than that," said Wood. "The buildings are actually turning to dust from the top down. It is as though two enormous trees were turning to sawdust before our eyes. The concrete floors, the desks, chairs, computers, even human beings and other living things, are being pulverized by some massive source of energy, which neither Jones' hypothesis nor the official account can explain. We are attempting to determine how this was done, but it probably involved the use of weapons that are classified. There's nothing 'wacky' about trying to figure it out."[...]
The adjunct math lecturer it cites, Gary Welz, told CBS NEWS that he is not a "conspiracy theorist" because he is not convinced there was a government conspiracy. "If that's his position," Fetzer replied, "that's very peculiar. I can't imagine a serious member of Scholars who wouldn't be able to demonstrate that the government has been lying to the American people based upon studies at our web site, 911scholars.org. For CBS NEWS to put out a misleading and false report without consulting relevant experts," he observed, "makes this a stellar example of irresponsible reporting. It's a hatchet job!"
"A phone call could have cleared up these misconceptions," Fetzer said, "but Alfonso probably knew how he wanted to spin this. We have proven that the official account cannot possibly be true and are trying to figure out how it was done." He smiled and said, "It is ironic that more accurate information about Scholars for 9/11 Truth can be found in HUSTLER than on CBS NEWS."...
"9/11: The Roots of Paranoia" by Christopher Hayes (Dec. 25) drew more mail than almost any Nation article in memory, except perhaps on the JFK assassination. Letters ran the gamut from the enraged (canceled subscriptions, charges of Nation stonewalling, anger at the use of the term "paranoia") to the complimentary ("My thanks to Mr. Hayes for trying to chart a middle road between credulity and paranoia"). But almost all agree that we don't know the whole story of what happened on September 11, 2001. --------------------------------------
Oregon, Wisc.
As the founder of Scholars for 9/11 Truth, I read "9/11: The Roots of Paranoia" with great interest. Its author cites a few of the questions that have troubled students of 9/11, but neglects most of the answers that we have established based upon objective, scientific investigation. In the name of fair play, here is a summary of our findings, substantiation for which may be found at our website, www.st911.org.
One preliminary point. If belief in conspiracies is enough to qualify one as "paranoid," then our highest government officials should be escorted to homes for the mentally bewildered, since they had been propounding a conspiracy theory even prior to investigation. Consider:
The impact of the planes cannot have caused enough damage to bring the buildings down, since the buildings were designed to withstand them (as Frank DeMartini, the project manager, observed), the planes that hit were similar to those they were designed to withstand, and the buildings continued to stand after those impacts with negligible effects.
The melting point of steel at 2,800 degrees F is about 1,000 degrees higher than the maximum burning temperature of jet-fuel-based fires, which do not exceed 1,800 degrees under optimal conditions, so the fires cannot have caused the steel to melt, which means that melting steel did not bring the buildings down.
UL certified the steel in the buildings up to 2,000 degrees F for three or four hours before it would significantly weaken, whereas these fires burned too low and too briefly at an average temperature of around 500 degrees--about one hour in the South Tower and one and a half in the North--to have even caused the steel to weaken, much less melt.
If the steel had melted or weakened, the affected floors would have displayed completely different behavior, with some asymmetrical sagging and tilting, which would have been gradual and slow, not the complete, abrupt and total demolition that was observed.
William Rodriguez, the senior custodian in the North Tower and the last man to leave the building, has reported massive explosions in the sub-basements that effected extensive destruction, including the demolition of a fifty-ton hydraulic press and the ripping of the skin off a fellow worker, a report corroborated by the testimony of many other custodians.
Rodriguez has reported that the explosion occurred prior to the airplane's impact, a claim that has now been substantiated in a new study by Craig Furlong and Gordon Ross, "Seismic Proof: 9/11 Was an Inside Job," which demonstrates that these explosions actually took place as much as fourteen and seventeen seconds prior to the airplanes' impacts.
Heavy-steel-construction buildings like the Twin Towers are not generally capable of "pancake collapse," which normally occurs only with concrete structures of "lift slab" construction and could not occur in redundant welded-steel buildings, such as the towers, unless every supporting column were removed at the same time, as Charles Pegelow has pointed out to me.
The destruction of the South Tower in about ten seconds and of the North Tower in nine is even faster than free fall with only air resistance, which would have taken at least twelve seconds, which, as Judy Wood has emphasized, is an astounding result that would have been impossible without extremely powerful explosives.
The towers are exploding from the top, not collapsing to the ground, where their floors do not move, a phenomenon that Wood has likened to two gigantic trees turning to sawdust from the top down, which, like the pulverization of the concrete, the official account cannot possibly explain.
Pools of molten metal were found at the subbasement levels three, four and five weeks later, an effect that could not have been produced by the plane-impact/jet-fuel-fire/pancake collapse scenario, which, of course, implies that it was not produced by such a cause.
WTC-7 came down in a classic controlled demolition at 5:20 pm after Larry Silverstein suggested the best thing to do might be to "pull it," displaying all the characteristics of classic controlled demolitions: a complete, abrupt and total collapse into its own footprint, where the floors are all falling at the same time, and so forth, an event so embarrassing to the official account that it is not even mentioned in the 9/11 Commission report.
The hit point at the Pentagon was too small to accommodate a 100-ton airliner with a 125-foot wingspan and a tail that stands forty-four feet above the ground; the debris was wrong for a Boeing 757: no wings, no fuselage, no seats, no bodies, no luggage, no tail! Which means the building was not hit by a Boeing 757.
The Pentagon's own videotape does not show a Boeing 757 hitting the building, as even Bill O'Reilly admitted when it was shown on The O'Reilly Factor; at 155 feet, the plane was more than twice as long as the seventy-one-foot Pentagon is high and should have been present and visible; it was not, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757.
The aerodynamics of flight would have made the official trajectory--flying at high speed barely above ground level--physically impossible; and if it had come in at an angle instead, it would have created a massive crater; but there is no crater and the government has no way out, which means that the building was not hit by a Boeing 757.
If Flight 93 had come down as advertised, there should have been a debris field about the size of a city block, but the debris is distributed over an area of about eight square miles, which would be explainable if the plane had been shot down in the air but not if it had crashed, as required by the government's official scenario.
There is more, especially about the alleged hijackers, including that they were not competent to fly the planes and their names were not on any passenger manifest. Several have turned up alive and well and living in the Middle East. The government has not even produced their tickets as evidence that they actually could have boarded the aircraft they are alleged to have hijacked. Did Osama call from a cave in Afghanistan and charge them to his MasterCard?
President Bush recently acknowledged that Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9/11. The Senate Intelligence Committee has reported that Saddam was not in cahoots with Al Qaeda. And the FBI has acknowledged that it has "no hard evidence" to tie Osama to 9/11. If Saddam did not do it and Osama did not do it, then who is responsible for the deaths of 3,000 Americans that day? We believe the nation is entitled to the truth.
Silvio Berlusconi, former Italian Prime Minister linked to the P2 Masonic Lodge terror cell and other false-flag operations, is apparetly now using his media empire to attack researchers into 9/11. From Il Giornale 15 novembre 2007: 
The History Channel is jointly owed by Hearst, General Electric, and Disney. Tonight, they'll attempt to prop up the official conspiracy theory of 9/11 by attacking skeptics. Listing from its History.com: 
From [Madison, Wisc.] Capitol Times, 8/11/2007: 
Via RINF.com July 16th, 2007: 
A scheduled Thursday appearance on ABC's "The View" by two of the directors of Loose Change and 9/11 Keymaster Willie Rodriguez has been canceled.
Black-helicopter nutjob Michelle Malkin had six questions about the official story of 9/11 back in 2002. 
Recent research reveals the WTC "controlled demolition" debate has been a constructed Hegelian dialectic since no later than 9/12 2001. For it was on that day that one Van Romero, of New Mexico Tech, announced in the local Albuquerque Journal that the Twin Towers were obviously taken out by a conventional controlled demolition. Romero quickly and quietly retracted his claim and disappeared from the scene. What was not revealed until now however, is that Romero is a major player in directed-energy weaponry, and a long time member of the Directed-Energy Professional Society (See 911researchers.com).
When 9/11 researchers last week discovered and disseminated a clip of BBC news reporters announcing that WTC building 7 had "collapsed" more than 20 minutes before it was destroyed in a controlled demolition on September 11, 2001. Leading corporate-connected, CIA- and NWO-controlled websites such as Google Video attempted to purge the video from the web, but ultimately gave up in the face of thousands fo grassroots infowarriors continuously uploading the video.
John Conner of the Resistance reports that talk show host Alan Colmes will no longer discuss the 9/11 inside job on his radio program. Alex Jones and others have discussed the matter in the past on the show. From Loose Change Forum Feb 3 2007: 
Press release from Scholars for 9/11 Truth February 1, 2007: 
One of several letters published in the Feb. 5, 2007 edition of The Nation in response to the Marxist rag's hit-piece on 9/11 truth (introduction included):
FEED
KEY DOCUMENTS ]
DAVE EMORY
Unedited audio of complete CNN interview of Christopher Bollyn